Durkheim’s views on religion were very interesting
to say the least. I believe that some of his ideas hold true today, but others
have fallen through the cracks. He defined religion as the belief in one God.
While this is true for some religions such as Christianity and Islam, it is not
true for a lot of other like Hinduism or Greek mythology. Today, there are so
many different religions that are practiced around the world and they are all
so different that it would be impossible for anyone to put just 1 basic
definition to what religion is. This is where I think Durkheim could have gone
wrong, since he left out so many religions in the definition, he was only
thinking of religions that were the most predominant at the time.
Durkheim also puts out this idea of sacred versus
profane. He says that something sacred, “is something added to and above the
real (73).” Profane, on the contrary, is something that doesn’t have any
special or spiritual magical power to it. He says that something becomes sacred
through interactions between individuals within a church or other place of
worship. We can attach meaning to anything to make it sacred. An example given
in class was the cross. Someone could look at it as just two pieces of wood put
together while others may see it as something that stands for the taking away
of our sins. In the picture that I chose for this blog, there is a bunch of
crosses that all look different. I thought that this stood for how, even
though, they are all crosses, they look very different, and each person interprets
the meaning of a cross in a different way.
I believe that Durkheim had some good ideas about
what religion is and why people practice the way that they do. He did leave
some religions out but I think this is mainly because of the time period that
he was in. The world was not as diverse back then, so the majority of people
did practice religions in which the belief in one God was common.
The cross example is a great one. Maybe the best and most clear object out there with multiple meanings to multiple people.
ReplyDeleteTo your last statement: I'm not sure if I would say that world was less diverse in Durkheim's day. Maybe just that the knowledge of vastly different cultures and religions wasn't as widespread as today.
Great observations!